Skip to content

Tourists in Crimea are choosing not to check into hotels.

Car travel to Crimea by tourists is on the rise. As Dmitry Gladkov, a resort hotel network head, stated, tourists used to book transfers to hotels but this interest has dwindled significantly by a factor of 10. According to Gladkov, the majority of the guests are now opting for independent...

Tourists in Crimea are resisting check-ins at hotels
Tourists in Crimea are resisting check-ins at hotels

Tourists in Crimea are choosing not to check into hotels.

## Driving to Crimea: Challenges and Tourist Behaviour Shifts

Recent reports suggest that driving to Crimea from the Kuban region in southern Russia presents some unique challenges, particularly at the Crimean Bridge[1]. Despite these issues, tourists continue to flock to the peninsula, as evidenced by the lengthy queues at the bridge's entrance[2].

### Inspection Delays and Queue Management

The inspection process at the Crimean Bridge appears to be the main bottleneck, with wait times reaching 3-4 hours[1]. Despite this, there is no evidence that using paid roads within Kuban reduces these delays, as the choke point is the bridge access, not the regional highway network[3].

### Road Quality and Scenic Routes

While no specific data is available about the quality of paid roads in Kuban compared to free roads, the region is known for its scenic routes, such as those passing through poppy fields, lotus valleys, and lavender fields[5]. These rural roads may offer a more pleasant, albeit slower, driving experience, but there is no evidence that toll roads offer a significant advantage in terms of speed or comfort for the final leg to the bridge.

### Tourist Behaviour Shifts

Dmitry Gladkov, the head of a network of resort hotels in Crimea, has observed a change in tourist behaviour[4]. Guests are now staying in one hotel for 5-6 nights before moving to another, and there has been a significant decrease in interest in transfer services, suggesting an increase in self-driven travel[4]. The reasons for this shift remain unspecified.

### Summary

| Aspect | Paid Roads in Kuban | Free Roads in Kuban | Crimean Bridge Access | |-----------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| | Driving Experience | No specific data | Scenic, possibly slower | Severe congestion, long waits[1] | | Queue Management | Unlikely to help | Unlikely to help | Main bottleneck, 3+ hour waits[1] | | Scenic Value | Unlikely | High (fields, valleys)[5] | N/A | | Tourist Traffic | Possible, but reduced[5] | Possible, but reduced[5] | High, but frustrated by delays[1] |

### Conclusion

The primary hurdle for drivers traveling to Crimea from Kuban is the lengthy wait at the Crimean Bridge inspection points, which can exceed three hours during peak periods[1]. There is no indication that choosing paid roads within Kuban offers a faster or more comfortable journey to the bridge. Free, scenic routes may provide a more enjoyable drive but do not alleviate the final bottleneck. Overall, the experience is dominated by congestion at the bridge, with road conditions within Kuban itself appearing secondary to this systemic delay.

Travelers may find alternative routes through the scenic roads of Kuban, offering a more pleasant drive with views of poppy fields, lotus valleys, and lavender fields, potentially fitting for those seeking a slower pace. However, this route does not guarantee a speedier or more comfortable final leg to the Crimean Bridge, as the main bottleneck remains at the bridge's access points. Despite the delays, the increase in self-driven travel among tourists suggests a shift towards a more independent lifestyle, demonstrated by extended stays in different hotels and reduced interest in transfer services.

Read also:

    Latest